Administrative Violence

In the light of the charges against OPP Police Officers in an infant death in Canada, here is an article from France24, a news organization in France.

Femicide (feminicide) increased by twenty percent in 2021. This article shows how endangering the administration is - how it does not stop violent action.


In Canada an amber alert was called because a father abducted his infant child. The child was killed in pursuit by OPP police officers who understood through a dispatcher that the toddler was in the car. They approached and fired and that baby died.


Had there been a respect for the life of a child and an understanding of how fathers losing control can use children to create violence, they could have responded in a different way.


Women are advised to not tell judges of internal violence, by lawyers. This is the state of the bias in Canada.

In court a huge drama is created to trigger those inside it, no different than an abduction -- people are asked to react.

If there is no judiciary member in the court who can be triggered another event will be staged. This pattern of violence contributes to the danger to women and children when they say no.


In 2016 three officers appeared at my hotel, one of them told me he had permission to arrest me - solely on the information given by my ex husband and his lawyer. During this altercation in a hotel lobby, I was told by the senior officer to be quiet. He said, 'I will have to arrest you and then (the child) will have to go to him. Is that what you want?'

I had Non-Removal Order from the US state, we were leaving for the child's school. My other child was already there. We lived there five years. My ex husband was not allowing us to leave. He was enforcing control using police. This was recurring.

A younger police officer held my gaze and I could see his understanding. We all went up to the hotel room with my child, who the senior officer began to tell to listen to his mother, but I was not allowed to speak.

This motion brought by the father was to keep us in Ontario. Divisional Court (3 judge, highest court, Appeal Court of Ontario) would agree with me four months later, too late for my son who had hearing loss and was suffering blackouts 'two an hour mom, I came to in a public washroom.' Still the court and the team on the other side refused to abide by Divisional Court and law. They wrote false setters to Homeland Security, the second time they would give false information to this administration. There was ongoing stalking regardless of legality. I gave a recorded statement to 2 police officers shortly before trial and another to 14 Division. At no time has anyone ever returned my communication. Downtown division listened to the father, though I had custody and had warned the Supervising Officer that my ex partner would lie about me. My son was in an unknown home which these police officers traveled to but refused to tell me where my son was. I had the Divisional Court Ruling, a Views and Preferences of the Child Report that stated the child's views were not his own, he had been influenced. Justice Patillo (Divisional Court) and Justice Wilson (Third Circuit Hawaii Court) both wrote this, Wilson going further, that the father should not be rewarded.


I had a Non-Removal Order from the US state but was not allowed to leave Ontario on my former partner and his lawyer's say so, a say so that was false. (Divisional Court's ruling agreed with me) The father had a Temporary Restraining Order against him at the time he abducted the child, which his lawyer denied service of (falsely). The judge (MacLeod of Peterborough) refused to read the whole page of incidents. He read the first sentence, an incident from infancy, and stated that it happened "a long time ago." This TRO was reviewed and signed by a US judge. MacLeod would argue as though he was in defense of the other party, rather than respect the boundary of a judge who had reviewed its contents.


A TRO is not assumed but reviewed and the judge rules on its contents. Judge MacLeod did not read its contents. Judge Patillo (Division Court ruling) wrote that J. MacLeod made palpable error, but the damage was done, and my son was now surrounded by what he called 'a group,' that would not let him see me. The Ontario lawyer would tell me, 'stop telling people (child) is missing.'


I discovered from my other child that the family group attempted to compare him with a family member who lived on social assistance, was a child user of marijuana. At this time I wrote to these people that this was child abuse. I was told by the father's lawyer in court in 2021 that he is at University but I have no information other than this one person saying this in court. The father hired false child lawyers, was reprimanded but said he would do so again if my son contacted me.


This group entitled themselves to parental rights, ignored court orders. The Ontario Superior Court of Ontario in September 2021 refused to allow me to present these arguments, and scientific report of effects. My child's call to emergency was denied him by the father's lawyer. She said, there was no 911 call. I have been threatened should he contact me.


Damaging women and children is creating a 'bounty' * on their lives. This 'bounty' is organized by the law profession.

see 'Noted and Denied' https://www.kalafilmbooktv.com/post/noted-and-denied and '6 Uncomfortable Truths' Aug. 28, 2022

https://www.kalafilmbooktv.com/post/5-uncomfortable-truths


* * * * * (warning description of

violence) photo CBC



https://www.france24.com/en/france/20220103-french-police-face-disciplinary-hearings-amid-high-numbers-of-femicide

Six French police officers face disciplinary hearings starting Tuesday accused of “administrative failings” in the gruesome case of Chahinez Daoud, who was killed by her husband last May. Daoud was one of 113 femicides in France in 2021, a number that continues to climb despite high-profile campaigns and government measures aimed at combating the violence.

ADVERTISING

Late in the afternoon of May 4, 2021, Chahinez Daoud stumbled out of her home on Avenue Carnot in the well-heeled Merignac neighbourhood near Bordeaux in southwestern France. The 31-year-old mother of three was being pursued by her estranged husband. He shot her in the legs a number of times and she fell to the ground. He took a can of flammable liquid from a van parked in front of their house, doused her with it and set her on fire. The fire brigade arrived shortly after 6.30pm but she was pronounced dead at the scene.

Her 44-year-old ex-husband fled before the authorities arrived. He was arrested half an hour later, almost 5 kilometres away in the neighbouring district of Pessac. At the time of his arrest he was in possession of a 12-gauge shotgun, a pellet gun and a cartridge belt.

Their children – ages 3, 7 and 11 – lived with their mother but were not at home at the time of the gruesome attack.

At the time of Daoud’s murder her ex-husband had already been convicted by the Bordeaux criminal court, in June 2020, of committing “intentional violence” against her. He received an 18-month sentence but was released the following December, although he was forbidden from making contact with his former partner.

France remains one of the European countries with the highest number of femicides per capita. It is estimated that at least one woman is killed by her partner or former partner every three days.

Just two months before the attack, Daoud had lodged a new complaint against her ex-husband. But the police officer’s report was illegible and was never properly forwarded to court authorities, according to a state review of how the case was handled.

“It is important to know that a third of femicide victims lodge a complaint with police before being killed – yet no real action is taken to prevent the crime from happening,” Maëlle Noir, a member of the national steering committee of the French feminist collective Nous Toutes (“All of us”), told FRANCE 24. “The French government is not taking enough measures to protect victims.”

“There is a crucial lack of training when it comes to taking complaints with regard to gender-based violence. This should be mandatory for anyone dealing with vulnerable people who come to them to report an attack or fear of an attack.”

The officer who took Daoud's complaint on March 15 had himself recently been convicted of "habitual intra-family violence", the public prosecutor's office said in July, confirming a report published in the weekly Le Canard enchaîné.

"We were informed on June 24 by the Bordeaux enforcement judge that one of the officials who took the complaint from Chahinez Daoud had himself been convicted of domestic violence," the Bordeaux prosecutor's office told AFP.

The officer received a suspended eight-month prison sentence and was in the middle of disciplinary proceedings when he recorded Daoud’s complaint. He was only moved from a post dealing with the public after she was killed.

>> FRANCE 24 on femicide: Our stories on violence against women

‘Administrative failings’

Eight months to the day after Daoud’s grisly murder, six police officers will appear before two disciplinary boards – in Bordeaux and Paris – on January 4. Four officers and police commissioners, including the departmental director of public security (DDSP), will present their accounts in Paris while two police officers will be heard in Bordeaux.

The latter are suspected of "administrative failings", said Eric Marrocq, regional secretary of the Alliance police union, in comments to AFP. "A review of the case by the disciplinary committee will make it possible to address doubts about their impartiality and professionalism," he explained. The four superiors summoned to Paris include the commander of the western division and the commissioner of Mérignac.

“It is good that the police will now know there can be repercussions. But it is not enough,” Julia* from the collective Féminicides par compagnons ou ex, told FRANCE 24.

“The problem is not just with the police, it’s the whole system. The judiciary also plays a key part. If the police do their job well and arrest someone, it is up to the judge to administer the right punishment. Instead, we have recidivists being set free too quickly and returning to attack again.”

113 women in 2021

In 2019, 146 women were reported killed by a spouse or partner, a 21 percent increase from the previous year. Following protests across France, the government introduced the use of electronic bracelets to alert victims when their attackers are nearby in September 2020. That year there was a drop in killings: According to figures on domestic violence from the interior ministry, 102 women and 23 men were killed.

Daoud was the 39th of the eventual 113 women who died at the hands of a partner or ex-partner in France in 2021.

From 8am to 8pm on January 1, 2022, there were three femicides in different corners of France. The first victim was stabbed to death by her partner in western France. A second woman was killed by her husband at home in the northeast and the third victim was strangled by her ex-partner and then hidden in the boot of a car in Nice.

Hier, le 1/1 à Nice (06) une femme a été tuée par son ex-compagnon par strangulation. Le corps a été découvert dans un coffre de voiture. C’est le 3ème féminicide de l’année.@emmanuelmacron 3 féminicides en 24h et aucune réaction. C’est atroce. Source : @feminicidesfr pic.twitter.com/PEV0K8CWoR

#NousToutes (@NousToutesOrg) January 2, 2022

“The start of a new year is always a tricky time,” said Julia. “People don’t want to be alone. They seek out partners even if they are estranged – it can be a very stressful time. We always see peaks during the holidays, both winter and summer. Men are reminded that they are not going to be with their families and they can find this very difficult to deal with.”

Noir from Nous Toutes believes a sea change needs to happen in the way that French society thinks about gender-based violence.

Daily newsletter

Receive essential international news every morning

Subscribe

“It must happen across media, education, the judiciary – everywhere. We need to start thinking of it as a systemic issue rather than an individual issue. In the media, for example, femicides are often described as a fait divers (sensationalist news) rather than as a systemic, patriarchal issue. Education is clearly a key part of the change that need to happen.”

The collective Féminicides par compagnons ou ex has been recording all the femicides that happen in France for the past six years – 770 deaths since 2016.

“It is a difficult but necessary task to ensure that these women do not remain invisible, that they are named whenever possible and do not just become one of the many anonymous victims in a global annual figure that does not raise much concern or indignation among politicians or even society,” the group says on its Facebook page.

“These are not ‘family dramas’ or ‘breakup dramas’ or ‘crimes of passion’. These are conjugal femicides perpetrated by frustrated men who think they have a licence to kill.”


* 'Bounty' comes from the reversal of Roe v Wade,

Robert B. Hubbel, "The Soul of Our Nation", September 2, 2022.


7 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All